· 2/1/2001
Thomas Amadio v. Ford Motor Company
Citations
- 238 F.3d 919
- 11 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 641
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 1354
- 2001 WL 82915
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- listing cases in which court found attendance to be essential job function
- affirming summary judgment for employer: “[I]f an employer ‘bends over backwards to accommodate a disabled worker … it must not be punished for its generosity by being deemed to have conceded the reasonableness of so far- reaching an accommodation.’”
- “It is well-settled that speculation may not be used to manufacture a genuine issue of fact.”
- “Consequently, where a deposition and affidavit are in conflict, the affidavit is to be disregarded unless it is demonstrable that the statement in the deposition was mistaken.”
- in light of employee’s attendance record, “the extension of [employee’s] already lengthy leave by one more week would have been a futile concession, not a reasonable accommodation”
- “It is well settled that speculation may not be used to manufacture a genuine issue of fact.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cudahy, Coffey, Ripple
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.