Skip to main content
· 2/1/2001

Thomas Amadio v. Ford Motor Company

Citations

  • 238 F.3d 919
  • 11 Am. Disabilities Cas. (BNA) 641
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 1354
  • 2001 WL 82915

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • listing cases in which court found attendance to be essential job function
  • affirming summary judgment for employer: “[I]f an employer ‘bends over backwards to accommodate a disabled worker … it must not be punished for its generosity by being deemed to have conceded the reasonableness of so far- reaching an accommodation.’”
  • “It is well-settled that speculation may not be used to manufacture a genuine issue of fact.”
  • “Consequently, where a deposition and affidavit are in conflict, the affidavit is to be disregarded unless it is demonstrable that the statement in the deposition was mistaken.”
  • in light of employee’s attendance record, “the extension of [employee’s] already lengthy leave by one more week would have been a futile concession, not a reasonable accommodation”
  • “It is well settled that speculation may not be used to manufacture a genuine issue of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cudahy, Coffey, Ripple

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.