George S. Szmaj v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• excusing failure to make Rule 50 argument at close of evidence in situation where eviden- tiary defect “rationale collapses”
• excusing failure to make Rule 50 argument at close of evidence in situation where eviden- tiary defect “rationale collapses”
• excusing failure to make Rule 50 argument at close of evidence in situation where eviden- tiary defect “rationale collapses”
• calling an opinion where “there is no discussion of the point, only a conclusion . . . weak authority”
• excusing failure to make Rule 50 argument at close of evidence in situation where eviden- tiary defect “rationale collapses”
• the cited case provided at best only “weak authority” because there is no discussion of the point, only a conclusion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).