Linda J. Brumfield v. City of Chicago

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the circuit courts “have helpfully divided § 12132 into two clauses for purposes of analysis”
• holding that Title II of the ADA does not cover disability-based employment discrimination and noting that “employment is not ordinarily conceptualized as a ‘service, program, or activity’ of a public entity”
• concluding that “Title I specifically, comprehensively, and exclusively addresses disability discrimination in employment”
• holding that “program or activity” can be conceptualized as “the public entity’s outputs”
• concluding that “Title I specifically, comprehensively, and exclusively addresses disability discrimination in employment”
• noting that \tire EEOC defines ‘réasonable accorirmodation’ to refer to workplace adjustments ‘that enable an individual with a disability who is qualified to perform the essential functions of that position’ \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).