· 1/23/1997
John PLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E J. BRACH & SONS, INCORPORATED and E.J. Brach Corporation, Defendants-Appellees
Citations
- 105 F.3d 343
- 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1001
- 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,495
- 73 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1575
- 1997 WL 24524
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that to show pretext, the plaintiff must “squarely rebut” the specific reason articulated by the defendant
- “[D]i-rect evidence would be what [the employer] said or did in the specific employment decision in question: terminating [the employee].”
- to prove pretext, plaintiff must squarely rebut the specific reason articulated by the defendant
- “At this stage, the reason need only be facially nondiscriminatory.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Manion, Wood, Evans
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.