Skip to main content
· 1/23/1997

John PLAIR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. E J. BRACH & SONS, INCORPORATED and E.J. Brach Corporation, Defendants-Appellees

Citations

  • 105 F.3d 343
  • 1997 U.S. App. LEXIS 1001
  • 69 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 44,495
  • 73 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1575
  • 1997 WL 24524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that to show pretext, the plaintiff must “squarely rebut” the specific reason articulated by the defendant
  • “[D]i-rect evidence would be what [the employer] said or did in the specific employment decision in question: terminating [the employee].”
  • to prove pretext, plaintiff must squarely rebut the specific reason articulated by the defendant
  • “At this stage, the reason need only be facially nondiscriminatory.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Manion, Wood, Evans

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.