Skip to main content

Berry v. State

Citations

  • 233 S.W.3d 847
  • 2007 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 651
  • 2007 WL 1489797

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that CPS foster-care supervisor, who questioned defendant for purposes of finding proper ‘placement’ of defendant’s children, was not “an agent of law enforcement”
  • holding that a Rule 403 objection was not preserved for review where only a Rule 404 objection was raised at trial
  • holding CPS worker was not acting as law enforcement and noting CPS worker interviewed defendant at jail to discuss children’s'removal
  • holding a Rule 403 objection was not preserved where only a Rule 404 objection was raised
  • holding CPS investigator was not acting as law enforcement, noting CPS investigator’s purpose was to discuss removal with defendant, obtain social history, and discuss options for placing child with paternal relatives
  • holding that extraneous-offense evidence is admissible to establish intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Johnson, Price, Womack, Holcomb, Cochran, Hervey, Keller, Meyers, Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

200 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Berry v. State

321 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.