Skip to main content

Berry v. State

Citations

  • 703 So. 2d 269
  • 1997 WL 719177

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • the use of Biblical reference in closing arguments is acceptable and counsel is afforded broad latitude
  • the use of Biblical reference in closing arguments is acceptable and counsel is afforded broad latitude
  • victim-impact testimony is admissible “if it is necessary to develop the case, and if it is relevant to any of the aggravating circumstances”
  • where this Court found that an issue based on the prosecutor's statement that capital punishment was commanded by the scripture was procedurally barred 7 where there was no contemporaneous objection at trial, and that it was acceptable to use the Bible as a historical reference

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mills

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

188 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

118 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.