Skip to main content

Heitman v. State

Citations

  • 815 S.W.2d 681
  • 60 U.S.L.W. 2074
  • 1991 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 160
  • 1991 WL 111761

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Texas courts analyzing search and seizure under the state constitution are not bound by United States Supreme Court precedent analyzing the Fourth Amendment
  • holding that parties should designate federal and state issues as separate points of error and provide argument under each point
  • holding that parties should designate federal and state issues as separate points of error and provide argument under each point
  • holding that Texas courts analyzing search and seizure under the state constitution are not bound by United States Supreme Court precedent analyzing the Fourth Amendment
  • recognizing that “when analyzing and interpreting Art. I, § 9, TEX. CONST., will not be bound by Supreme Court decisions addressing the comparable Fourth Amendment issue”
  • concluding that “this Court, when analyzing and interpreting Art. I, § 9, Tex. Const., will not be bound by Supreme Court decisions addressing the comparable Fourth Amendment issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Miller, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

733 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

55 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Heitman v. State

9 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.