Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 6/16/2010

Estrada v. State

Citations

313 S.W.3d 274
2010 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 722
2010 WL 2382555

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that any error in admission of evidence was harmless in light of “very similar” evidence admitted without objection
holding that the defendant had not waived his due-process complaint by failing to timely object
holding that any error in the admission of evidence was harmless in light of the proper admission into evidence of very similar evidence
holding that any error in the admission of evidence was harmless in light of the proper admission into evidence of very similar evidence
holding that any error in admitting evidence was harmless when “very similar” evidence was properly admitted
holding that any challenge to statements in opening or closing was not preserved where appellant failed to object or move for mistrial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hervey, Keller, Meyers, Johnson, Keasler, Holcomb, Cochran, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

471 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

81 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.