Skip to main content

Solomon v. State

Citations

  • 49 S.W.3d 356
  • 2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 49
  • 2001 WL 687415

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that picture of victim in sailor’s uniform simply reflected the victim’s occupation and did not encourage comparisons between victim and other members of society
  • holding that a record supplementation rule “cannot be used to create a new appellate record”
  • holding that picture of victim in sailor’s uniform simply reflected the victim’s occupation and did not encourage comparisons between victim and other members of society
  • holding that, when a jury is instructed to determine whether a witness is an accomplice, the jury may believe that the witness was not an accomplice
  • holding that picture of victim in sailor = s uniform simply reflected the victim = s occupation and did not encourage comparisons between victim and other members of society
  • holding that trial court error regarding admission of evidence is generally nonconstitutional error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Meyers, Johnson, Price, Holland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

965 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Solomon v. State

156 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.