Skip to main content

Bryant v. State

Citations

  • 340 S.W.3d 1
  • 2010 WL 3212126

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that police investigator was qualified as expert to testify concerning concept of grooming
  • holding that police investigator was qualified as expert to testify concerning concept of grooming
  • noting that evaluation of expert's qualifications requires trial court to 36 determine whether witness has \a sufficient background in a particular field\
  • noting that evaluation of expert’s qualifications requires trial court to determine whether witness has “a sufficient background in a particular field”
  • Tyler police officer, assigned to Crimes Against Children Unit, who was lead investigator on the case
  • “The information about grooming could have influenced the jury’s credibility determinations, but only in an indirect fashion.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Michael Massengale

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

42 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.