Skip to main content

Berry v. State

Citations

  • 703 N.E.2d 154
  • 1998 Ind. LEXIS 749
  • 1998 WL 881214

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • declining to apply the incredible dubiosity rule to defendant’s argument that the testimony of the State’s witnesses conflicted, because no witness contradicted himself
  • declining to apply the incredible dubiosity rule where there were inconsistencies in the testimony among witnesses, but no one witness contradicted himself
  • declining to apply the incredible dubiosity rule to defendant’s argument that the State’s witnesses conflicted with one another, but no one witness contradicted himself or herself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Shepard, Dickson, Sullivan, Selby, Boehm

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

28 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.