Santellan v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the only requirement for restraint is that the interference with liberty be substantial
• holding that the act of loading victim in car and driving away was sufficient to constitute \restraint\ under kidnapping statute
• holding that appellant must make specific objection at trial to preserve appellate issue based on balancing under rule 403
• holding that the only requirement for restraint is that the interference with liberty be substantial
• holding that the act of loading victim in car and driving away was sufficient to constitute Arestraint@ under kidnapping statute
• recognizing that autopsy photos are generally admissible unless they depict mutilation of the victim caused by the autopsy itself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).