Routier v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant failed to preserve claim that trial court violated her rights by engaging in unrecorded ex parte communication by failing to make objection on that ground
• holding that appellant was not entitled to new trial where she failed to demonstrate that missing portion of record was necessary to resolution of appeal
• holding that appellant was not entitled to new trial where she failed to demonstrate that missing portion of record was necessary to resolution of appeal
• holding that an appellant’s suggestion that jury instructions may have been erroneous, without more, does not make that portion of the record necessary to the appeal
• holding that an appellant’s suggestion that jury instructions may have been erroneous, without more, does not make that portion of the record necessary to the appeal
• holding that an appellant’s suggestion that jury instructions may have been erroneous, without more, does not make that portion of the record necessary to the appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).