Skip to main content

Brown v. State

Citations

  • 333 S.W.3d 606
  • 2009 WL 1153412

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • grand jury testimony was properly read to the jury as a recorded recollection under Rule 803(5)
  • grand jury testimony was properly read to the jury as a recorded recollection under Rule 803(5)
  • where witness testified that he recalled some, but not all, of the details of an offense, the witness’s grand jury testimony was admissible under Rule 803(5)
  • trial court did not err in failing to instruct the jury to consider a witness’s prior inconsistent statements for impeachment purposes only where the witness’s prior statements were not offered for that purpose
  • “Preservation of error is a systemic requirement on appeal.” (footnote omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chief Justice Thomas and Justices Morris and Francis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

19 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.