Skip to main content

Coble v. State

Citations

  • 330 S.W.3d 253
  • 2010 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1297
  • 2010 WL 3984713

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a violation of the evidentiary rules that results in the erroneous admission of evidence is nonconstitutional error
  • recognizing that if improperly admitted evidence did not influence the jury or had but a slight effect upon its deliberations, such non-constitutional error is harmless
  • holding that a violation of the evidentiary rules that results in the erroneous admission of evidence is nonconstitutional error
  • holding that there was no violation of the right of confrontation where there is no out-of-court statement
  • holding that it is “not the case” that a jury would be “reasonably likely” to construe the statutory language in an unconstitutionally narrow fashion
  • explaining that critical question for excited utterance is “whether the declarant was still dominated by the emotion caused by the startling event when [he] spoke”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Price, Womack, Johnson, Holcomb, Meyers, Keller, Keasler, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

715 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

118 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Coble v. State

17 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.