Skip to main content

Berry v. State

Citations

  • 995 S.W.2d 699
  • 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 86
  • 1999 WL 436544

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the trial court had no jurisdiction to enter supplemental findings of facts and conclusions of law approximately two months after the trial record had been filed with the court of appeals
  • concluding that trial court’s supplemental findings made after receipt of trial record were “null and void, and should not have been considered by the court of appeals”
  • concluding that the trial court had no jurisdiction to enter supplemental findings of facts and conclusions of law approximately two months after the trial record had been filed with the court of appeals
  • findings and conclusions made by trial court after appellate record filed are null and void
  • disallowing supplementation of appellate record with “supplemental findings of fact and conclusions of law [that] all refer to off-the-record conversations” because “these conversations were never part of the trial record”
  • Court of Appeals is not empowered to remand for supplementation of the record with fact findings absent affirmative duty possessed by the trial court to make such findings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.