Ohio Supreme Court· 9/2/1987

State v. Roberts

Citations

32 Ohio St. 3d 225
513 N.E.2d 720
1987 Ohio LEXIS 373

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

stressing heavy psychological pressure to answer ques- tions posed by probation officer, who is figure of author- ity and trust
describing totality of the circumstances for assessing validity of Miranda warning as including “‘the apparent intellectual and emotional state of the suspect’”
stressing heavy psychological pressure to answer ques- tions posed by probation officer, who is figure of author- ity and trust
“[Statements by an in-custody probationer [in jail at the time] to his probation officer are inadmissible in a subsequent criminal trial, where prior to questioning, the probation officer failed to advise the probationer of his Miranda rights . . . .”
“[S]tatements by an in-custody probationer [in jail at the time] to his probation officer are inadmissible in a subsequent criminal trial, where prior to questioning, the probation officer failed to advise the probationer of his Miranda rights . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Brown, Douglas, Holmes, Locher, Moyer, Sweeney, Wright

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.