Skip to main content

State v. Roberts

Citations

  • 208 N.W.2d 744
  • 296 Minn. 347
  • 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1206

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that such testimony is generally inappropriate to the extent that it gives rise to an impermissible inference of culpability
  • concluding important factor in jury verdict was whether they believed the defendant or the victim
  • holding error was sufficiently prejudicial where jury had to determine whether they believed defendant or victim, where there were conflicts in testimony of both defendant and victim, and no eyewitnesses testified
  • holding where case’s outcome hinged on whether jury believed defendant or victim, erroneous admission of evidence that defendant requested counsel when asked by officer whether he committed crime could have reasonably influenced verdict and was not harmless error
  • stating court must be able to declare belief that error is harmless beyond reasonable doubt
  • holding error was sufficiently prejudicial to warrant new trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knutson, Rogosheske, Peterson, MacLaughlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

37 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.