Skip to main content

State v. Roberts

Citations

  • 817 P.2d 855
  • 117 Wash. 2d 576
  • 1991 Wash. LEXIS 395

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that for purposes of RCW 9.94A.360(6) the term \served concurrently\ does not mean beginning and ending at the same time
  • comparing the current and prior version of the same statute to define an ambiguous term
  • comparing the current and prior version of the same statute to define an ambiguous term
  • \The rule of lenity requires the court to adopt an interpretation most favorable to the criminal defendant.\
  • “The rule of lenity requires the court to adopt an interpretation most favorable to the criminal defendant.”
  • \' \[WJhere the Legislature uses certain statutory language in one instance, and different language in another, there is a difference in legislative intent.\' \

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Guy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.