Washington Supreme Court· 10/17/1991
State v. Roberts
Citations
- 817 P.2d 855
- 117 Wash. 2d 576
- 1991 Wash. LEXIS 395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that for purposes of RCW 9.94A.360(6) the term \served concurrently\ does not mean beginning and ending at the same time
- comparing the current and prior version of the same statute to define an ambiguous term
- comparing the current and prior version of the same statute to define an ambiguous term
- \The rule of lenity requires the court to adopt an interpretation most favorable to the criminal defendant.\
- “The rule of lenity requires the court to adopt an interpretation most favorable to the criminal defendant.”
- \' \[WJhere the Legislature uses certain statutory language in one instance, and different language in another, there is a difference in legislative intent.\' \
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Guy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. JacobsWashington Supreme Court· 2005-07-07· cited 385×
- State v. WardWashington Supreme Court· 1994-03-17· cited 303×
- State v. KintzWashington Supreme Court· 2010-08-26· cited 197×
- State v. LewisWashington Supreme Court· 1998-05-28· cited 167×
- In the Matter of CharlesWashington Supreme Court· 1998-05-28· cited 166×
- State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court· 1999-04-15· cited 136×
- State v. ParkerWashington Supreme Court· 1997-05-22· cited 118×
- State v. AndersonWashington Supreme Court· 2000-08-10· cited 116×
- State v. Villanueva-GonzalezWashington Supreme Court· 2014-07-17· cited 103×
- State v. McCrawWashington Supreme Court· 1995-07-20· cited 102×
- State v. BrownWashington Supreme Court· 1999-09-09· cited 102×
- State v. McGeeWashington Supreme Court· 1993-12-09· cited 93×
- State v. HutsellWashington Supreme Court· 1993-02-25· cited 92×
- State v. MathersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2016-05-10· cited 88×
- State v. ConoverWashington Supreme Court· 2015-08-13· cited 75×
- Peninsula School District No. 401 v. Public School EmployeesWashington Supreme Court· 1996-10-03· cited 61×
- Hegwine v. Longview Fibre Co.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2006-04-25· cited 58×
- State v. Ague-MastersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-04-17· cited 56×
- Matter of Personal Restraint of SietzWashington Supreme Court· 1994-09-15· cited 56×
- Neah Bay Chamber of Commerce v. Department of FisheriesWashington Supreme Court· 1992-07-23· cited 41×
Cites
11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- In Re the Detention SwansonWashington Supreme Court· 1990-12-05· cited 151×
- Human Rights Commission v. Cheney School District No. 30Washington Supreme Court· 1982-02-25· cited 107×
- United Parcel Service, Inc. v. Department of RevenueWashington Supreme Court· 1984-08-16· cited 105×
- State v. HornadayWashington Supreme Court· 1986-01-16· cited 96×
- State v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-08-29· cited 42×
- State v. HendersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-07-20· cited 27×
- State v. ChavezCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-12-01· cited 15×
- State v. HarperCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-02-08· cited 12×
- State v. HartleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1988-05-16· cited 8×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1987-09-04· cited 5×
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1990-07-03· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.