Supreme Court of Vermont· 6/18/1993
State v. Roberts
Citations
- 631 A.2d 835
- 160 Vt. 385
- 1993 Vt. LEXIS 66
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reasoning that officer who told suspect that his cooperation could result in reduced bail was making prediction about value of cooperation and did not render resulting confession involuntary
- concluding under Article 11 and Fourth Amendment “that, if the officer had a reasonable belief that the premises had been abandoned, his entry was lawful even if the premises had not been abandoned”
- police prediction that a statement by defendant might result in reduced bail was not sufficiently coercive to render subsequent confession involuntary
- police prediction that a statement by defendant might result in reduced bail was not sufficiently coercive to render subsequent confession involuntary
- where phone was disconnected, electricity was shut off, rent was two months in arrears, and rental agent believed that tenant had skipped out, landlord had apparent authority to consent to search even though personal property remained in house
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Allen, Gibson, Dooley, Morse, Johnson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
15 cases in this archive cite this case.
- United States v. BrazelEleventh Circuit· 1997-01-06· cited 228×
- State v. BaconSupreme Court of Vermont· 1995-02-17· cited 74×
- State v. BrauchIdaho Supreme Court· 1999-07-22· cited 37×
- In Re Appeal of Application for Search WarrantSupreme Court of Vermont· 2012-12-14· cited 26×
- Gregory W. Zullo v. State of VermontSupreme Court of Vermont· 2019-01-04· cited 21×
- State v. Weisler, State v. KingSupreme Court of Vermont· 2011-09-16· cited 18×
- State v. BrooksSupreme Court of Vermont· 2013-03-29· cited 12×
- State v. Rein KoltsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2018-12-14· cited 8×
- Green v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-03-23· cited 7×
- State v. Leo ReynoldsSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-04-08· cited 7×
- State v. Allen PrueSupreme Court of Vermont· 2016-09-09· cited 6×
- State v. Thomas Ferguson and Katherine A. FergusonSupreme Court of Vermont· 2020-05-29· cited 2×
- Routhier v. GogginsD. Vermont· 2017-01-18· cited 1×
- Unnamed caseEleventh Circuit· 1997-01-06
- In re YohVermont Superior Court· 2005-01-31
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Payton v. New YorkSupreme Court· 1980-04-15· cited 7,618×
- United States v. MatlockSupreme Court· 1974-02-20· cited 3,648×
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
- Abel v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 1,485×
- Bram v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1897-12-13· cited 1,397×
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-04-03· cited 891×
- United States v. Paul FerraraSecond Circuit· 1967-05-08· cited 121×
- State v. KirchoffSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-01-25· cited 93×
- Samuel Christopher Hawkins v. James A. Lynaugh, Director, Texas Department of CorrectionsFifth Circuit· 1988-04-29· cited 67×
- United States v. Gary Lavaughn WilsonNinth Circuit· 1973-02-12· cited 61×
- State v. RecordSupreme Court of Vermont· 1988-06-10· cited 51×
- United States v. George Leo Barfield, United States of America v. William James Rybka, United States of America v. William Donny HalesFifth Circuit· 1975-04-28· cited 47×
- State v. BlowSupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-11-01· cited 47×
- State v. TapiaArizona Supreme Court· 1988-12-08· cited 39×
- United States v. Lawrence C. FractionThird Circuit· 1986-06-30· cited 34×
- Fillinger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-08-17· cited 29×
- United States v. Keith Lamont HartFourth Circuit· 1980-04-14· cited 25×
- State v. BeckleySupreme Court of Vermont· 1991-10-11· cited 15×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.