Skip to main content
Ohio Supreme Court· 1/16/2018

State v. Beasley

Citations

  • 108 N.E.3d 1028
  • 153 Ohio St. 3d 497
  • 2018 Ohio 493

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Nunc pro tunc entries ‘are limited in proper use to 3 reflecting what the court actually decided, not what the court might or should have decided or what the court intended to decide.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Connor, Dewine

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

287 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

89 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.