Court of Appeals of Oregon· 8/28/2002
State v. Roberts
Citations
- 52 P.3d 1123
- 183 Or. App. 520
- 2002 Ore. App. LEXIS 1362
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that “fact-matching is not helpful” in the civil commitment context
- noting that, in determining whether evidence is sufficient to warrant involuntary commitment, “fact-matching is not helpful”
- recognizing that \fact-matching is not helpful\ in the civil commitment context
- observing that “[w]hether the evidence in any case is sufficient must be decided on its own facts; fact-matching is not helpful”
- holding that the appellant was not a danger to self, because wan- dering the streets while unmedicated had never resulted in injury; therefore, civil commitment did not “interrupt[ ] a sequence of events that ha[d], in the past, led to disaster”
- reversing civil commitment where the appellant “wandered] the streets in a confused state of mind”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Landau, Brewer, Schuman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. S. R. J.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-10-19· cited 84×
- State v. B. B.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-29· cited 77×
- State v. M. A.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2016-03-02· cited 44×
- State v. D. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-15· cited 38×
- State v. OlsenCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-10-18· cited 27×
- State v. HambletonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-11-16· cited 21×
- State v. HayesCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2005-10-12· cited 21×
- State v. WebbCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2003-02-19· cited 18×
- State v. M. T.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-01-06· cited 18×
- State v. R. E.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-07· cited 13×
- State v. S. G.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2025-02-20· cited 13×
- Dorn v. Teacher Standards and Practices Comm.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2021-12-08· cited 12×
- State v. JuddCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-05-17· cited 10×
- State v. C. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2013-10-09· cited 9×
- State v. C. R.Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-05· cited 6×
- State v. T. W. (In re T. W.)Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2018-05-09· cited 2×
- State v. RECourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2012-03-07
- State v. DRCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-15
- State v. BBCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2010-12-29
- State v. CRCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2007-12-05
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- O'Neill v. O'NeillOregon Supreme Court· 1976-01-22· cited 153×
- State v. BuntingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1992-03-11· cited 73×
- State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-03-28· cited 40×
- State v. AyalaCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1999-12-15· cited 39×
- State v. BrungardCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1990-07-18· cited 33×
- State v. JayneCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-05-09· cited 31×
- State v. KingCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2001-10-31· cited 26×
- State v. SimonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 2002-03-20· cited 19×
- State v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon· 1994-12-07· cited 17×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.