Court of Appeals of Washington· 4/14/1980
State v. Roberts
Citations
- 611 P.2d 1297
- 25 Wash. App. 830
- 1980 Wash. App. LEXIS 2182
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- reversing conviction where defendant was precluded entirely from cross-examining alleged rape victim regarding whether her testimony that the sex was not consensual was coerced
- trial court may exclude evidence tending only remotely to show bias or prejudice
- cross examination of a witness to elicit facts which tend to show bias, prejudice or interest is generally a matter of right, but the scope of such cross examination is within the discretion of the trial court
- information not reduced to conviction inadmissible
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Callow
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. RussellWashington Supreme Court· 1994-10-13· cited 831×
- State v. DardenWashington Supreme Court· 2002-03-07· cited 345×
- State v. Perez-ValdezWashington Supreme Court· 2011-10-13· cited 85×
- State v. CarlsonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1991-07-15· cited 58×
- In Re the Dependency of C.B.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-05-13· cited 57×
- State v. KilgoreCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-10· cited 44×
- State v. KunzeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-11-10· cited 36×
- State v. LubersCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1996-05-10· cited 34×
- State v. JoinerMissouri Court of Appeals· 1991-11-12· cited 28×
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1985-06-26· cited 26×
- State v. MunguiaCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-07-19· cited 23×
- State v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-08-09· cited 22×
- State v. BussCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1995-02-06· cited 22×
- State v. ClassenCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-02-05· cited 20×
- State v. ALLEN S.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1999-12-17· cited 19×
- State v. HedrickMissouri Court of Appeals· 1990-09-25· cited 19×
- State v. SmithWashington Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 19×
- State v. HolmesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-06-15· cited 15×
- State v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1983-07-25· cited 12×
- State v. BarnesCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1989-06-20· cited 12×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
- Alford v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-02-24· cited 1,352×
- Spokane & Inland Empire Railroad v. CampbellSupreme Court· 1916-06-12· cited 142×
- People v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court· 1897-06-16· cited 67×
- State v. RuzickaWashington Supreme Court· 1977-11-03· cited 52×
- State v. RobbinsWashington Supreme Court· 1950-01-06· cited 45×
- State v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court· 1967-03-02· cited 39×
- State v. TateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1970-04-02· cited 37×
- State v. RobinsonWashington Supreme Court· 1974-07-03· cited 33×
- State v. KnappCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1975-08-06· cited 31×
- State v. JonesWashington Supreme Court· 1965-11-24· cited 30×
- State v. ArnoldWashington Supreme Court· 1924-07-16· cited 25×
- State v. BrewsterWashington Supreme Court· 1969-01-09· cited 23×
- Fuller v. StateArizona Supreme Court· 1922-03-24· cited 23×
- State v. PetersonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1970-04-21· cited 22×
- State v. StevensonCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1976-11-04· cited 19×
- State v. WilderCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-04-26· cited 18×
- State v. KimballCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1976-03-01· cited 16×
- State v. HurleyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-04-22· cited 14×
- State v. ButlerCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-07-17· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.