Skip to main content

State v. Roberts

Citations

  • 612 P.2d 1055
  • 126 Ariz. 92
  • 1980 Ariz. LEXIS 224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that while the court reversed conviction because of error to exclude witness, it must address insufficient evidence argument because of double jeopardy considerations
  • “[Fjailure to honor an exclusionary request is presumed prejudicial unless the absence of prejudice is clearly manifest from the record.”
  • father’s story changed at time of trial and court found it was possible that changes were due to hearing other witness’s testimony at trial
  • a change in testimony of a fact witness after hearing two other witnesses amounted to prejudice

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gordon, Struckmeyer, Cameron, Holohan, Hays

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.