Supreme Court· 5/23/1991
Florida v. Jimeno
Citations
- 500 U.S. 248
- 111 S. Ct. 1801
- 114 L. Ed. 2d 297
- 1991 U.S. LEXIS 2910
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing that the Supreme Court has long approved consensual searches because it is reasonable for police to search once they have permission to do so
- holding that consent to search of a vehicle encompassed consent to search a closed container found in the vehicle
- holding that a suspect may delimit the scope of a search for which he has consented
- holding that consent to search authorized search of the trunk absent indication that the consent was more limited
- holding that it was \objectively reasonable for the officer to believe that the scope of the suspect's consent permitted him to open a particular container within [an] automobile\
- holding that it was “objectively reasonable for the officer to believe that the scope of the suspect’s consent permitted him to open a particular container within [an] automobile”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Blackmun, Kennedy, Marshall, O'C, Rehnqlist, Rehnquist, Scalia, White
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
1,444 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court· 1996-11-18· cited 2,025×
- Atwater v. City of Lago VistaSupreme Court· 2001-04-24· cited 1,388×
- Muscarello v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-06-08· cited 848×
- United States v. RusherFourth Circuit· 1992-06-03· cited 809×
- People v. JenkinsCalifornia Supreme Court· 2000-06-28· cited 769×
- Valtierra v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2010-05-05· cited 747×
- People v. AlvarezCalifornia Supreme Court· 1996-12-05· cited 660×
- Dubbs Ex Rel. Dubbs v. Head Start, Inc.Tenth Circuit· 2003-07-21· cited 658×
- People v. TullyCalifornia Supreme Court· 2012-07-30· cited 629×
- Peterson v. City of Fort Worth, Tex.Fifth Circuit· 2009-11-17· cited 586×
- State v. DunnUtah Supreme Court· 1993-03-18· cited 447×
- Mark A. Lee v. City of ChicagoSeventh Circuit· 2003-05-22· cited 388×
- Safford Unified School District 1 v. ReddingSupreme Court· 2009-06-25· cited 365×
- United States v. WackerTenth Circuit· 1995-12-26· cited 358×
- Gates v. Texas Deparment of Protective & Regulatory ServicesFifth Circuit· 2008-07-31· cited 355×
- State v. RobertsOhio Supreme Court· 2006-08-02· cited 348×
- United States v. John Jay Hill and Malcolm Scott HillSixth Circuit· 1999-10-04· cited 337×
- Reedy v. EvansonThird Circuit· 2010-08-02· cited 317×
- United States v. Jaime Soto, Also Known as Leonel GuerraTenth Circuit· 1993-03-22· cited 289×
- United States v. Scottie Ray HurstSixth Circuit· 2000-09-22· cited 288×
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court· 1983-06-08· cited 16,716×
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1967-12-18· cited 13,304×
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court· 1973-05-29· cited 11,783×
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court· 1983-03-23· cited 6,728×
- United States v. RossSupreme Court· 1982-06-01· cited 3,985×
- South Dakota v. OppermanSupreme Court· 1976-07-06· cited 3,445×
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1990-06-21· cited 2,581×
- United States v. ChadwickSupreme Court· 1977-06-21· cited 2,561×
- Arkansas v. SandersSupreme Court· 1979-06-20· cited 1,484×
- Cardwell v. LewisSupreme Court· 1974-06-17· cited 1,012×
- Florida v. WellsSupreme Court· 1990-04-18· cited 1,010×
- Robbins v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1981-09-23· cited 503×
- State v. WellsSupreme Court of Florida· 1989-03-02· cited 112×
- State v. JimenoSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-07-26· cited 6×
Other cases named Florida v. Jimeno
6 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.