Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 5/23/1991

Florida v. Jimeno

Citations

  • 500 U.S. 248
  • 111 S. Ct. 1801
  • 114 L. Ed. 2d 297
  • 1991 U.S. LEXIS 2910

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the Supreme Court has long approved consensual searches because it is reasonable for police to search once they have permission to do so
  • holding that consent to search of a vehicle encompassed consent to search a closed container found in the vehicle
  • holding that a suspect may delimit the scope of a search for which he has consented
  • holding that consent to search authorized search of the trunk absent indication that the consent was more limited
  • holding that it was \objectively reasonable for the officer to believe that the scope of the suspect's consent permitted him to open a particular container within [an] automobile\
  • holding that it was “objectively reasonable for the officer to believe that the scope of the suspect’s consent permitted him to open a particular container within [an] automobile”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Blackmun, Kennedy, Marshall, O'C, Rehnqlist, Rehnquist, Scalia, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,444 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Florida v. Jimeno

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.