Coolidge v. New Hampshire

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a warrant issued by the state Attorney General who prosecuted the defendant was invalid
• holding that a warrant issued by the state Attorney General who prosecuted the defendant was invalid
• holding that the Fourth Amendment \requir[es] a `particular description' of the thing to be seized\
• holding that the Fourth Amendment \requir[es] a 'particular description’ of the thing to be seized\
• holding that, if private persons act wholly on their own initiative, evidence turned over to police is admissible
• holding that the government has the burden of proving an exception to the warrant requirement and discussing the search-incident-to-arrest exception, the automobile exception, and the plain-view-seizure exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Coolidge v. New Hampshire

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Coolidge v. New Hampshire
  Supreme Court· 1970-06-29· cited 1×
• Coolidge v. New Hampshire
  Supreme Court· 1970-10-12