Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/14/1993

State v. Gonzalez

Citations

855 S.W.2d 692
1993 WL 109439

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that “the accused is required to allege sufficient grounds to apprise the trial judge and the State as to why he believes himself entitled to a new trial”
holding that whether to grant a new trial lies within the trial court’s discretion
holding that whether to grant a new trial lies within the trial court’s discretion
holding that whether to grant a new trial lies within the trial court's discretion
noting that court of criminal appeals has consistently held that decision on motion for new trial rests within sound discretion of trial court
adding that it is not reviewing court’s place to substitute its judgment for that of trial court but to determine whether its decision was unreasonable or arbitrary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird, Maloney, Meyers, Campbell, Clinton, McCormick, White

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

412 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named State v. Gonzalez

349 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.