Court of Appeals of Texas· 5/31/2001
Jackson v. State
Citations
- 50 S.W.3d 579
- 2001 Tex. App. LEXIS 3664
- 2001 WL 579881
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring that a conviction be both recent and demonstrate a propensity for running afoul of the law
- requiring that a conviction be both recent and demonstrate a propensity for running afoul of the law
- explaining that subsequent misdemeanor convictions involving moral turpitude remove the taint of remoteness from out-of-date convictions and place them under the rule 609(a) standard
- holding the defense of necessity was raised by evidence that (1
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cayce, Gardner, Walker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
174 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- West v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-10-02· cited 239×
- Franks v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-10-24· cited 191×
- Sierra v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2005-01-20· cited 105×
- Pennington v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2001-10-04· cited 100×
- Barnes v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-22· cited 95×
- Pena v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2007-05-02· cited 95×
- Moore v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2004-07-21· cited 72×
- Woodall v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-05-02· cited 67×
- Roberson v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2003-04-09· cited 65×
- Pena v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2005-04-27· cited 63×
- State v. VasquezTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2007-06-28· cited 62×
- Grotti v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2006-11-17· cited 54×
- Salazar v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2005-11-23· cited 54×
- Vrba v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2002-01-30· cited 53×
- Kevin DWayne Kennemur v. StateTex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-05-08· cited 53×
- Hankins v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2005-11-30· cited 50×
- Throneberry v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2003-05-15· cited 46×
- Meadows v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2015-02-25· cited 43×
- Ernest Leyba v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2013-08-13· cited 41×
- Mark Fleming v. StateTex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2012-08-02· cited 32×
Cites
67 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Montgomery v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 7,264×
- Almanza v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1985-02-27· cited 6,557×
- California v. TrombettaSupreme Court· 1984-06-11· cited 3,405×
- Arizona v. YoungbloodSupreme Court· 1989-01-23· cited 3,366×
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1998-07-01· cited 2,969×
- Wesbrook v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2000-09-20· cited 2,816×
- Ladd v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1999-10-06· cited 1,900×
- Matson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-10-16· cited 1,540×
- Dinkins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1995-02-01· cited 1,534×
- McDuff v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1997-01-22· cited 1,412×
- United States v. Valenzuela-BernalSupreme Court· 1982-07-02· cited 1,404×
- Abdnor v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-01-26· cited 1,398×
- Kelly v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-02-05· cited 1,156×
- Narvaiz v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-09-23· cited 944×
- Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-04-11· cited 877×
- Royster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1981-09-23· cited 763×
- Hernandez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-09-18· cited 613×
- Felder v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1992-09-16· cited 557×
- Madden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-11-28· cited 557×
- State v. GonzalezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-04-14· cited 511×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.