Skip to main content

Keeter v. State

Citations

  • 175 S.W.3d 756
  • 2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 521
  • 2005 WL 766974

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a Brady claim was waived when neither the State nor the trial court understood that one was being presented
  • holding that a Brady claim was waived when neither the State nor the trial court understood that one was being presented
  • holding that a Brady claim was waived when neither the State nor the trial court understood that one was being presented
  • holding that the defendant’s failure to include an argument in his motion for new trial and at its hearing rendered it unpreserved
  • holding that defendant did not preserve Brady claim for appellate review when it was not raised in his motion for new trial or during motion for new trial proceedings
  • holding that defendant did not preserve Brady claim for appellate review when it was not raised in his motion for new trial or during motion for new trial hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Keller, Womack, Keasler, Hervey, Cochran, Meyers, Holcomb, Johnson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

106 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.