Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 12/16/1992
State v. Evans
Citations
- 843 S.W.2d 576
- 1992 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 238
- 1992 WL 366951
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding motion to withdraw or reconsider plea should more aptly have been called a motion for new trial and order granting motion was functionally indistinguishable from order granting a new trial, thereby allowing State to appeal
- holding motion to withdraw or reconsider plea should more aptly have been called a motion for new trial and order granting motion was functionally indistinguishable from order granting a new trial, thereby allowing State to appeal
- permitting State to appeal from defendant's \Motion to Withdraw Plea of Nolo Contendere\ by construing it as the granting of a motion for new trial
- noting that motion’s title is not controlling
- “While designated as a motion to reconsider a plea, appellant’s motion should more aptly have been called a motion for new trial.”
- post-trial motion to withdraw plea was functionally indistinguishable from motion for new trial, and was properly treated as such
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Benavides
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
102 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Mallett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2001-12-19· cited 1,369×
- Reyes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-02-03· cited 695×
- State v. GonzalezCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-04-14· cited 511×
- State v. HerndonCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2007-02-28· cited 423×
- Jordan v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1994-04-27· cited 327×
- State v. RobertsCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-12-11· cited 310×
- State v. SavageCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1996-11-06· cited 130×
- Dusenberry v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1996-02-01· cited 127×
- Prudhomme v. StateTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-08-16· cited 121×
- Coronado v. StateTex. App. Ct., 10th Dist. (Waco)· 2000-07-26· cited 108×
- Scaggs v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-06-22· cited 100×
- Labib v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2007-08-16· cited 91×
- State v. KelleyTex. App. Ct., 6th Dist. (Texarkana)· 2000-04-05· cited 90×
- Houston v. StateTex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2006-08-10· cited 80×
- State v. ReadTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 1998-03-12· cited 75×
- State v. ArizmendiCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2017-05-17· cited 70×
- Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 2002-01-10· cited 66×
- State v. DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2011-10-05· cited 63×
- State v. BoydTex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 2006-08-28· cited 61×
- Lanum v. StateTex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1997-07-16· cited 61×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.