Buerger v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the trial court had not abused its discretion in not holding a hearing on appellant’s motion for new trial because appellant “failed to explain or demonstrate that the significance of [his attorney’s] actions, if true, were deficient or how they harmed him”
• “As a general rule, a penalty assessed within the proper punishment range will not be disturbed on appeal.”
• “As a general rule, a penalty assessed within the proper punishment range will not be disturbed on appeal.”
• trial court did not err in denying hearing on motion for new trial that was supported only be conclusory affidavit

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).