Cantu v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “In ruling on his evidentiary sufficiency challenge, we will not join appellant in speculation over the thought-processes of jurors during their deliberations.”
• testimony did not convey interviewer’s opinion as to whether child was telling truth; testimony indicated only that interviewer believed allegations came from child rather than from someone telling child what to allege
• testimony did not convey interviewer’s opinion as to whether child was telling truth; testimony indicated only that interviewer believed allegations came from child rather than from someone telling child what to allege
• mem. op., not designated for publication
• mem. op., not designated for publication

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).