Supreme Court of New Jersey· 12/6/1977

State v. Gonzalez

Citations

380 A.2d 1128
75 N.J. 181
1977 N.J. LEXIS 273

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that the State, having lost a motion to suppress brought by a co-defendant, was not entitled to re-litigate that issue, on the same facts, with respect to defendant
explaining that collateral estoppel bars re - litigation of any issue decided in prior action
explaining that collateral estoppel bars re-litigation of any issue decided in a prior action
explaining that collateral estoppel bars re-litigation of any issue decided in prior action
noting that “no constitutional command is implicated here since the defendant had not been placed in jeopardy in the [previous] hearing[,]” but going on to hold that nonmutual collateral estoppel should apply in limited circumstances
acknowledging “the State” as the party to a prior criminal proceeding for collateral estoppel purposes

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pashman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

104 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.