Supreme Court of Kansas· 6/18/2010
State v. Gonzalez
Citations
- 234 P.3d 1
- 290 Kan. 747
- 2010 Kan. LEXIS 426
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying abuse of discretion standard when reviewing district court decision on motion to quash subpoena
- abuse of discretion review includes consideration of whether the lower court correctly understood and applied controlling legal standards
- abuse of discretion occurs when the decision is based on factual determinations not supported by the evidence
- district court abuses its discretion when it fails to follow the law
- failure to abide by legal framework constitutes abuse of discretion
- discussing distinction between privilege law and attorney ethics
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beier, Davis, Solomon
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
59 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-07-29· cited 1,316×
- State v. StaffordSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-12-14· cited 340×
- State v. Rojas-MarcelenoSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-09-21· cited 229×
- State v. JollySupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-02-20· cited 184×
- State v. McCaslinSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-01-21· cited 177×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-11-06· cited 152×
- State v. PeppersSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-05-04· cited 136×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2018-10-05· cited 125×
- State v. CarrSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-07-25· cited 125×
- State v. EddySupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-03-21· cited 122×
- State v. WARRIORSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-05-11· cited 121×
- State v. RoederSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-10-24· cited 108×
- State v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-02· cited 99×
- State v. BogguessSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-01-20· cited 80×
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-10-28· cited 75×
- State v. AndersonSupreme Court of Kansas· 2011-03-18· cited 75×
- State v. GaonaSupreme Court of Kansas· 2012-03-02· cited 70×
- Gannon v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas· 2015-09-21· cited 66×
- State v. RandolphSupreme Court of Kansas· 2013-05-10· cited 64×
- State v. MaestasSupreme Court of Kansas· 2014-01-24· cited 61×
Cites
54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court· 1947-01-13· cited 4,981×
- Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1935-04-15· cited 4,581×
- Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp.Supreme Court· 1990-06-11· cited 4,510×
- Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1996-06-13· cited 3,761×
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1981-01-13· cited 3,227×
- United States v. United Mine Workers of AmericaSupreme Court· 1947-03-06· cited 2,872×
- Swidler & Berlin v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1998-06-25· cited 387×
- State v. PabstSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-02-11· cited 246×
- Flautt & Mann v. Council of City of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee· 2008-04-10· cited 186×
- State Ex Rel. Stovall v. MeneleySupreme Court of Kansas· 2001-04-27· cited 148×
- State v. ShopteeseSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-03-16· cited 113×
- Donald K. Stern v. United States District Court for the District of MassachusettsFirst Circuit· 2000-06-22· cited 107×
- Owen Lumber Co. v. ChartrandSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-05-04· cited 82×
- OMI Holdings, Inc. v. HowellSupreme Court of Kansas· 1996-06-07· cited 81×
- Saucedo v. WingerSupreme Court of Kansas· 1993-04-16· cited 77×
- Cypress Media, Inc. v. City of Overland ParkSupreme Court of Kansas· 2000-01-28· cited 75×
- In Re Grand Jury Subpoenas. United StatesTenth Circuit· 1990-07-02· cited 68×
- Vorhees v. BaltazarSupreme Court of Kansas· 2007-03-16· cited 62×
- In Re Tax Appeal of Collingwood Grain, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas· 1995-03-10· cited 58×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.