Supreme Court of Connecticut· 9/6/2011
State v. Gonzalez
Citations
- 25 A.3d 648
- 302 Conn. 287
- 2011 Conn. LEXIS 355
- 2011 WL 3802478
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “[subsequent] careful and thorough administration of Miranda warnings serve [s] to cure the condition that rendered the [prior] unwarned statement inadmissible” [internal quotation marks omitted]
- police told defendant that it was his ‘‘opportunity to talk to them and to tell his side of the story’’ without first providing Miranda warn- ings
- officer's statement to defendant in interview room that \it was his opportunity to tell his side of the story\ was functional equivalent of interrogation because it explicitly sought statements from defendant regarding his involvement in crime
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Zarella, Norcott, Palmer, Zaxella, McLachlan, Eveleigh, Harper, Vertefeuille
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. JordanSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2012-05-29· cited 24×
- State v. DonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2017-05-02· cited 13×
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2012-03-16· cited 10×
- State v. HaynesSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-07-01· cited 10×
- State v. ArtisConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-07-10· cited 9×
- State v. MillerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-08-14· cited 7×
- State v. RoseConnecticut Appellate Court· 2011-12-20· cited 6×
- State v. GarrisonConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-07-19· cited 6×
- State v. SumlerConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-07-21· cited 5×
- State v. WatersConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-08-02· cited 5×
- State v. WrightConnecticut Appellate Court· 2013-08-06· cited 5×
- State v. JonesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2012-12-11· cited 4×
- State v. TinsleyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2020-05-12· cited 3×
- State v. BouvierConnecticut Appellate Court· 2021-12-07· cited 3×
- State v. RussawConnecticut Appellate Court· 2022-06-21· cited 3×
- State v. EarlyConnecticut Appellate Court· 2014-08-26
- State v. James E.Connecticut Appellate Court· 2015-01-20
- State v. LabargeConnecticut Appellate Court· 2016-04-05
- State v. Haynes (Concurrence & Dissent)Supreme Court of Connecticut· 2025-07-01
- State v. DukesConnecticut Appellate Court· 2026-06-09
Cites
61 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1963-01-14· cited 12,871×
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1931-12-11· cited 10,676×
- Edwards v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1981-06-22· cited 6,931×
- Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court· 1980-05-12· cited 5,571×
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1975-06-26· cited 4,589×
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court· 1985-03-04· cited 2,824×
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1994-06-24· cited 2,777×
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1989-12-19· cited 2,736×
- Michigan v. MosleySupreme Court· 1975-12-09· cited 2,561×
- Dickerson v. United StatesSupreme Court· 2000-06-26· cited 1,932×
- Missouri v. SeibertSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 1,541×
- New York v. QuarlesSupreme Court· 1984-06-12· cited 1,468×
- Oregon v. BradshawSupreme Court· 1983-06-23· cited 1,351×
- Smith v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1984-12-10· cited 1,225×
- Garrett v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1985-08-28· cited 1,001×
- United States v. PataneSupreme Court· 2004-06-28· cited 619×
- State v. WilliamsOhio Supreme Court· 1983-08-24· cited 530×
- People v. WoodSupreme Court of Colorado· 2006-05-30· cited 414×
- State v. SalamonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 2008-07-01· cited 243×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.