Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 2/28/2001

Ex Parte Taylor

Citations

36 S.W.3d 883
2001 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 17
2001 WL 194772

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that an appellant is not entitled to “hybrid representation” on appeal
holding that an appellant is not entitled to “hybrid 2 the time the offense was committed, the trial court’s action was not authorized by Article 42.08(b) of the Texas Code Criminal Procedure. TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. art. 42.08(b) (West Supp. 2013
stating “[a]ppellants are not allowed to have hybrid representation” and appellant did not have right to file documents with appellate court while represented by counsel
stating “[a]ppellants are not allowed to have hybrid representation” and appellant did not have right to file documents with appellate court while represented by counsel
stating “[a]ppellants are not allowed to have hybrid representation” and appellant did not have right to file documents with appellate court while represented by counsel
holding appellants do not have right to hybrid representation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keller, Keasler, Holcomb, Johnson, Hervey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

162 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

52 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Ex Parte Taylor

68 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.