Skip to main content

Coble v. State

Citations

  • 871 S.W.2d 192
  • 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 171
  • 1993 WL 441858

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that prosecutor’s calling the defense’s argument “ridiculous” during closing was an attack on the defense attorney’s argument rather than on the defense attorney as a person and holding that argument was proper
  • reaching similar conclusion concerning prosecutor’s statement that “when you have neither [the facts nor the law] on your side, you argue something ridiculous”
  • reaching similar conclusion concerning prosecutor’s statement that “when you have neither [the facts nor the law] on your side, you argue something ridiculous”
  • finding evidence did not raise self-defense because appellant initiated the encounter, and “it was [the victim] who was acting in self-defense”
  • finding no error in not submitting jury instructions on self-defense when the evidence at trial established from the outset that the appellant intended to kill the victim and no counter-evidence was presented
  • finding prosecutor = s statement that defense counsel argued something A ridiculous @ was proper because it was directed at defense counsel = s argument, not at defense counsel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird, Campbell, Clinton, Maloney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

157 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.