Johnson v. Fourth Court of Appeals

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that trial court was within discretion in granting a new trial \in the interest of justice and fairness\
• holding that trial court was within discretion in granting a new trial “in the interest of justice and fairness”
• holding that trial court was within discretion in granting a new trial \in the interest of justice and fairness\
• holding that trial court was within discretion in granting a new trial “in the interest of justice and fairness”
• holding that the courts of appeals do not have authority to consider merits of a void order
• holding that if there is some basis in reason and in law for a trial court's order, a court of appeals abuses its discretion when vacating the lower court's order by mandamus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).