Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 10/5/2005

Haley v. State

Citations

173 S.W.3d 510
2005 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1621
2005 WL 2442545

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that, to preserve error for appellate review, an objection must be timely, specific, and pursued to an adverse ruling
holding that a reviewing court may consider defensive theories and closing arguments when conducting for nonconstitutional error under TEX. R. APP. P. 44.2(b)
holding that error preservation is a systemic requirement that the court of appeals must review regardless of whether the parties raised the issue
holding that a bench conference is a hearing conducted outside the presence of the jury for purposes of obtaining a running objection pursuant to Texas Rule of Evidence 103(a)
concluding that preservation of error requires objection “each time inadmissible evidence is offered”
holding State need only show beyond a reasonable doubt that prior extraneous offenses or bad acts are attributable to defendant for purposes of article 37.07(3)(a)(1)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keasler, Price, Womack, Johnson, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran, Keller, Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

424 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Haley v. State

56 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.