Skip to main content

Jackson v. State

Citations

  • 17 S.W.3d 664
  • 2000 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 55
  • 2000 WL 628320

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that prosecutor’s response that defense would have called its expert to the stand if it had seriously disputed State’s evidence was proper jury argument
  • holding that once evidence is submitted, it can be used during jury argument to reiterate a point and summarize the evidence
  • holding that once evidence is submitted, it can be used during jury argument to reiterate a point and summarize the evidence
  • holding that the State may comment Dale v. State Page 12 on an appellant’s failure to present evidence in his favor, as long as the remarks do not fault the defendant for failing to testify
  • holding that summation of admitted evidence is proper in a jury argument
  • holding that summation of admitted evidence is proper in a jury argument

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Mansfield, McCormick, Meyers, Keller, Holland, Womack, Johnson, Keasler

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

790 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.