Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 4/15/1998

Johnson v. State

Citations

967 S.W.2d 410
1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 49
1998 WL 172815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

recognizing that a violation of an evidentiary rule that results in the erroneous admission of evidence is subject to a non-constitutional harm analysis
holding that the trial court’s error in admitting hearsay evidence was not constitutional error
explaining that where error did not influence the jury, appellant’s substantial rights are not affected
explaining that where error did not influence the jury, appellant's substantial rights, are not affected
holding that the admission of inadmissible evidence is non-constitutional error that we will consider harmless if, after examining the record, we are reasonably assured the error did not influence the jury or had but slight effect
explaining that where error did not influence the jury, appellant = s substantial rights are not affected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mansfield, McCormick, Overstreet, Price, Baird, Meyers, Holland, Keller, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1,483 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.