Skip to main content
· 10/20/1999

Ibarra v. State

Citations

  • 11 S.W.3d 189
  • 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 117
  • 1999 WL 956173

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that nothing is preserved for review if objection at trial does not comport with issue on appeal
  • holding that nothing is preserved for review if objection at trial does not comport with issue on appeal
  • holding that nothing is preserved for review if objection at trial does not comport with issue on appeal
  • holding that “[b]ecause [appellant’s] trial objection does not comport with the issue raised on appeal, [appellant] has preserved nothing for review”
  • holding that nothing is preserved for review if objection at trial does not comport with issue on appeal
  • holding that, because appellant's trial objection did not comport with his objection on appeal, appellant failed to preserve error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Meyers

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.