Skip to main content

Martinez v. State

Citations

  • 867 S.W.2d 30
  • 1993 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 201
  • 1993 WL 561706

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the defendant was aware of the potential that the State would call an expert witness during the punishment phase which he might need to rebut so there was no unexpected occurrence
  • affirming that issues on appeal must correspond to objection raised in trial court

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Baird, Clinton, Maloney, Overstreet

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

222 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

41 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.