Skip to main content

Taylor v. State

Citations

  • 268 S.W.3d 571
  • 2008 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1627
  • 2008 WL 4724147

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that it was appropriate to require proponent of hearsay exception to make record reflect that statement in question was important to efficacy of treatment
  • holding that it was appropriate to require proponent of hearsay exception to make record reflect that statement in question was important to efficacy of treatment
  • holding that error in admitting child's statement to counselor identifying defendant as assailant was harmless when child repeatedly told her version of events to other witnesses and jury
  • holding that it was appropriate to require proponent of hearsay exception to make record reflect that statement in question was important to efficacy of treatment
  • holding that trial court abuses its discretion only if its decision is “so clearly wrong as to lie outside the zone within which reasonable people might disagree”
  • holding that error in admitting the complainant’s statement to counselor identifying defendant as assailant was harmless when the complainant repeatedly told her version of events to other witnesses and the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cochran, Hervey, Holcomb, Johnson, Keasler, Keller, Meyers, Price, Womack

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

692 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

54 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.