Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 12/15/2004

Woods v. State

Citations

152 S.W.3d 105
2004 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 2146
2004 WL 2896253

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that trial court did not err by instructing jury that State is not required to prove guilt beyond all possible doubt
holding that admitting a statement in violation of Article 38.22 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure was “non-constitutional error”
holding that the timing and spontaneity of statements against interest tend to establish their reliability
holding that jury instruction that “beyond a reasonable doubt” does not mean the prosecution must prove guilt beyond all possible doubt does not attempt to define reasonable doubt, and thus does not violate Paulson
stating that the erroneous admission of an appellant’s statement in violation of article 38.22 amounts to nonconstitutional error
stating that the erroneous admission of an appellant’s statement in violation of article 38.22 amounts to nonconstitutional error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Price, Womack, Keller, Meyers, Johnson, Keasler, Hervey, Holcomb, Cochran

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

340 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

33 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.