Skip to main content

Barnes v. State

Citations

  • 876 S.W.2d 316
  • 1994 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 21
  • 1994 WL 36894

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the trial objection did not comport with the issue raised on appeal; consequently, there was no preservation for review
  • holding that the trial objection did not comport with the issue raised on appeal; consequently, there was no preservation for review
  • holding that the trial objection did not comport with the issue raised on appeal; consequently, there was no preservation for review
  • holding that any error by the trial court in allowing a witness to testify over a claim of surprise is made harmless if the defendant failed to object or move for a continuance
  • explaining that Rules of Evidence 401, 402, and 403 were modified since holding in Burdine
  • explaining that Rules of Evidence 401, 402, and 403 were modified since holding in Burdine

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McCORMICK

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

468 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.