Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Citations

  • 30 A.3d 516
  • 2011 Pa. Super. 219
  • 2011 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3235
  • 2011 WL 4839049

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “any petition filed after the judgment of sentence becomes final will be treated as a PCRA petition.”
  • stating that this Court has “repeatedly held that any petition filed after the judgment of sentence becomes final will be treated as a PCRA petition.”
  • stating that this Court has “repeatedly held that any petition filed after the judgment of sentence becomes final will be treated as a PCRA petition.” (citation and ellipses omitted)
  • treating Jackson’s “motion to correct illegal sentence,” that was filed more than twenty years after sentencing, as a PCRA petition
  • analyzing an appellant’s “motion to correct illegal sentence” as a PCRA petition
  • “any petition filed after the judgment of sentence becomes final will be treated as a PCRA petition.” (citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Lazarus, Ott

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Commonwealth v. Jackson

275 other CourtListener records share this case name; the 50 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.