Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 5/13/1975

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Citations

337 A.2d 582
461 Pa. 632
1975 Pa. LEXIS 815

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“[fundamental to the application of the ‘plain view doctrine is the principle that the seized objects must not have been put in plain view as a result of unlawful police conduct.”
suspicious and furtive behavior of defendants insufficient probable cause to search automobile
suspicious and furtive behavior of defendants insufficient probable cause to search automobile
“Fundamental to the application of the ‘plain view’ doctrine is the principle that the seized objects must not have been put in plain view as a result of unlawful police conduct.”
information from five months before issuance of warrant too remote
information from five months before issuance of warrant too remote

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jones, Eagen, O'Brien, Roberts, Pomeroy, Nix, Manderino

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.