Commonwealth v. Jackson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, under the reasoning in Danysh, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to consider defendant’s pro se Act 84 petition to stop the DOC from deducting 20% of his earnings from his inmate account to pay for court-ordered costs and restitution
• affirming the trial court’s conclusion that it lacked jurisdiction over defendant’s Act 84 motion without prejudice to seek relief in the Commonwealth Court
• “the concepts of ‘institutional comity’ and ‘system- wide efficiency’ should not be relied upon as reasons for this Court’s exercise of appellate jurisdiction.”
• “the concepts of ‘institutional comity’ and ‘system- wide efficiency’ should not be relied upon as reasons for this Court’s exercise of appellate jurisdiction.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Wilkins v. Marsico
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2006-07-21· cited 112×
• Commonwealth v. Price
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-05-27· cited 94×
• Mohn, D. v. Bucks Co. Republican Committee
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-09-03· cited 17×
• Gordon v. Philadelphia County Democratic Executive Committee
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2013-11-07· cited 15×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Danysh v. Department of Corrections
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-03-24· cited 47×
• Commonwealth v. Danysh
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-09-17· cited 43×
• Commonwealth v. Parella
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2003-10-31· cited 19×
• Commonwealth v. Fleming
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-07-23· cited 16×
• Boofer v. Lotz
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-04-22· cited 14×
• Commonwealth v. Smith
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-11-24· cited 13×
• Commonwealth v. Baker
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2001-08-17· cited 9×
• Boofer v. Lotz
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-02-17· cited 4×