Skip to main content

Commonwealth v. Jackson

Citations

  • 907 A.2d 540
  • 2006 Pa. Super. 218
  • 2006 Pa. Super. LEXIS 2159

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that frisks for weapons can be appropriate when police confront suspect in area known for guns and violence
  • recognizing that frisks for weapons can be appropriate when police confront a suspect in an area known for guns and violence
  • recognizing that frisks for weapons can be appropriate when police confront a suspect in an area known for guns and violence
  • recognizing that frisks for weapons can be appropriate when police confront a suspect in an area known for guns and violence
  • stating that a conviction under Section 5104 was proper where the defendant “continued to resist attempts to subdue him by spitting blood and saliva at [the officer]”
  • rejecting the “automatic companion rule” and noting that our courts require individualized suspicion that a suspect may be armed and dangerous before proceeding to a valid frisk

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevens, Gantman, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.